On 11/18/2008 07:54 PM, Matt Rose wrote: > Whoops, see comments in the previous email. Attached is the updated spec > I've cleaned up a bit the spec, making it closer to the Fedora guidelines. It still has some errors because the list of files passed to % files includes the following files and directories which are already owned by other packages (and with no chance to be left unowned, should rubygems be uninstalled): /usr/bin (owned by filesystem) /usr/lib (owned by filesystem) /usr/lib/ruby (owned by ruby-libs) /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby (owned by ruby-libs) /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 (owned by ruby-libs) And last but not least, I think that a %test section would be nice to be included. Unfortunately I know no ruby at all, so I cannot create this part of the spec for you. And I am to busy^H^H^H^Hlazy to read the docs now. Hope this helps. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: rubygems.spec URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20081119/2b710590/attachment-0007.ksh>