Jeff Johnson wrote: >> that 'find' has to die. the only way to put it is 'thats just wrong >> for every reasons'. > Inconsistent with existing packaging practices and policies is perhaps > more accurate. yes. > There is nothing 'wrong' with having a directory owned by multiple > packages no matter how many reasons you think you know. But if it can be avoided, for me its always worked best if that does not happen. Also, I have a bigger problem with the generic 'find everything in there'; setting a finite expected list is way better. imho anyway. - KB