On 10/13/08, Dag Wieers <dag at centos.org> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: > >> Check the following links once again, please: >> >> http://wiki.centos.org/AlainRegueraDelgado?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=en-centos-lifecycle.png >> http://wiki.centos.org/AlainRegueraDelgado?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=es-centos-lifecycle.png ... > Alain, > > I am afraid there is too much information on a single page, and it is > harder to understand because of those dates you added. > > Also I would not call it "Full Updates" and "Maintenance Updates". Red Hat > turned away from those names and now call it phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3 > (iirc) so that you are forced to read what they mean. I am sure marketing > wanted to avoid people to only take notice of when they had "Full updates" > aka. "Full support". > > Update releases are now officially every 6 months. > > Also the Full Updates phase should be 4 years out of the 7 years for RHEL4 > and RHEL5. To me it looks like it is only 3 years on your slide. (eg. > RHEL4 is not out of Full Support yet). > > The location of the minor release number is very confusing, I think people > may make the wrong conclusion based on the location inside of the bar. > > Suffice to say I like my original slide over this one. Dag, could we work together in the graphical display building ? I'd appretiate a table or somthing with relevant dates, concepts ... one for CentOS and maybe one for RHEL ... maybe we could open a page in the wiki to list this kind of information and to list how these graphical display should be conceived. It would be a place to put ideas, progress and whatever people consider helpfull. Karan: The logo image and Login link in https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork seem to be desapierd. Do you know something about it ? > PS I noticed there was "Maintainance Updates" in the slide instead of > Maintenance. Yep, I mistaken the word here ... I'll fix it on the next render :). Thanks, al.
