On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> >> Yes, it asks - no, it doesn't create: >> >> System User [nobody]: dirserv >> The user 'dirserv' is invalid. >> >> So: Opinions on hacking that into the RPMs/setup script? > > Is there a bugreport about this somewhere ? > > If that should get into the rpms/setup script is Tim's call.... IMHO, I would create a bugreport in upstreams bugzilla (and in ours for reference), document it on the wiki page and wait for upstream to fix it. I prefer to keep the packages as closely to upstreams as possible. In this case is a pretty simple thing that can be done manually, not a real bug in the code, more a missing feature. Anyway, if people shout hard enough I just might add it. Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be at gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the "microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds)