[CentOS-devel] Todo list for the Artwork SIG
Alain Reguera Delgado
alain.reguera at gmail.com
Fri Sep 19 14:10:54 UTC 2008
On 9/17/08, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
> Marcus Moeller wrote:
>> I have not really suggested to use this or that. I just wantet to make
>> clear that we should keep the content in one single place for better
> I agree. And trac provides a very good mechanism for this. Given that
> its in use such widely, a lot of people are already familiar with the
> milestones / aims / features and the fact that you can url into the scm
> from the wiki makes in-revision tracking trivial. You can also assocated
> issues with milestones and releases and handle wiki content within the
> same context.
> So it can be as easy as you want, but it can also easily do more complex
> things if you need it to.
>> There are some disadvantages in using trac which I have already lined
>> out. One is the 'bad url' to access the trac pages. If
>> artwork.centos.org (or something like that) would link to trac and the
>> wiki just points there, all content could be kept in the trac wiki.
> the URL issue does not look like anything major to me personally, also I
> dont see much of a differences in https://projects.centos.org/ and
> http://artwork.centos.org. Specially since the trac wiki is only 1 click
> away from the https://projects.centos.org link. The wiki.centos.org page
> at http://wiki.centos.org/Projects can have a few more comments about
> each project if so required.
Ok. I believe we should move the http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork
content to https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/wiki ... if there
is no one against that. So the Trac facilities on projects management
could be used.
If that is ok ... some help would be nice :D
More information about the CentOS-devel