On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:53:55PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > There is now a perl package in the c5-testing repo that fix's these issues. > Unless I hear reports of breakage in the next 24 hrs, will push that out > via the fasttrack repo and make some announcements. > > Also, if you do test it - and it does work fine : let us know about that > too. As others have reported, this seems to fix the main speed issues people were complaining about. But it doesn't seem to have changed the overload referencing semantics that DBIx::Class::StartupCheck tests for - this still fails on the new perl: perl -MDBIx::Class::StartupCheck -e1 WARNING: DBIx::Class::StartupCheck: This version of Perl is likely to exhibit extremely slow performance for certain critical operations. Please consider recompiling Perl. For more information, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196836 and/or http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2007-October/005119.html. You can suppress this message by setting DBIC_NO_WARN_BAD_PERL=1 in your environment. You can also test this with this script: #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; package Foo; use overload bool => sub { 0 }; sub quack { print "quacks like a Foo\n" } package main; my %hash; my $o1 = \%hash; my $o2 = \%hash; bless $o1, 'Foo'; print $o1 ? "o1 true\n" : "o1 false\n"; print $o2 ? "o2 true\n" : "o2 false\n"; $o2->quack(); which reports: o1 false o2 false quacks like a Foo on both the old and new CentOS perls, vs. o1 false o2 true quacks like a Foo on Ubuntu 5.8.8. Karanbir, do you know if those fixes you used include the four changesets Nicholas references here? http://use.perl.org/~nicholas/journal/37274 I'm not sure how much this actually matters in practice, but thought I'd point it out. It's at least confusing if the performance issue is fixed but DBIx::Class still complains. Cheers, Gavin