Ned Slider wrote: > Would someone take a quick look at the SMF license to see if it meets > the project's minimum requirements or not: > > http://www.simplemachines.org/about/license.php "Any Distribution of a Modified Package or derivative requires express written consent from Simple Machines LLC" turns me off a bit. <http://cmsreport.com/node/1777> has some more information about that. "Any Distribution of this Package, whether as a Modified Package or not, requires express written consent from Simple Machines LLC." doesn't really sound better. > At least then we can either tick a box or eliminate one possibility > taking a little step closer to a solution :) I don't like the license :) >> Requirements: > <snip> >> - Must address the specific requirements raised by the present >> www.centos.org forum users ( Can you please fill this section in ? ) > > This is a task I can do. Where/how would you like the information? Why not here in this thread first? > Once we have a slightly shorter shortlist, I'm happy to go off and test > some existing forum sites (using said shortlist) for end-user usability > in this regard too. Cool. Thank you. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080925/dd3990c4/attachment-0007.sig>