[CentOS-devel] i386/noarch RPMS differences between x86_64 and i386 repos?
James Pearson
james-p at moving-picture.comTue Apr 14 09:47:06 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] no drbd after update to 5.3
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] i386/noarch RPMS differences between x86_64 and i386 repos?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have my own local copies of the CentOS 5.3 x86_64 and i386 repos - and to save space, I ran 'hardlink' over the RPMS directories - however it found that a number of the i386 and noarch RPMS in the x86_64 tree were 'different' from the matching RPMS in the i386 tree. Out of the 1186 i386/noarch RPMS on the 5.3 x86_64 iso image, 222 are different from the matching i386/noarch RPMS from the i386 iso image The difference appears to be the 'Signature' date - the rest of the info from 'rpm -qi' appears identical. Most of these 'different' RPMS are ones that have been updated in 5.3 Is there a reason why these RPMS have a different signature date? Not a major issue ... Thanks James Pearson
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] no drbd after update to 5.3
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] i386/noarch RPMS differences between x86_64 and i386 repos?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list