[CentOS-devel] i386/noarch RPMS differences between x86_64 and i386 repos?

Charlie Brady

charlieb-centos-devel at budge.apana.org.au
Tue Apr 14 13:28:26 UTC 2009

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:

> On 04/14/2009 10:47 AM, James Pearson wrote:
>> Is there a reason why these RPMS have a different signature date?
> Some of these noarch packages have issues with rsync, so forcing a

What are the "issues" with rsync?

> resign for them when the x86_64 tree is signed is one way to make sure
> they are different enough to have rsync actually sync them over.

More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list