[CentOS-devel] i386/noarch RPMS differences between x86_64 and i386 repos?
Charlie Brady
charlieb-centos-devel at budge.apana.org.auTue Apr 14 13:28:26 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] i386/noarch RPMS differences between x86_64 and i386 repos?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Updated xfs-kmod?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/14/2009 10:47 AM, James Pearson wrote: >> Is there a reason why these RPMS have a different signature date? > > Some of these noarch packages have issues with rsync, so forcing a What are the "issues" with rsync? > resign for them when the x86_64 tree is signed is one way to make sure > they are different enough to have rsync actually sync them over.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] i386/noarch RPMS differences between x86_64 and i386 repos?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Updated xfs-kmod?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list