[CentOS-devel] there's something happened between kernel 2.6.28-128.1.1 and 2.6.18-128.1.6 compilation
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgMon Apr 20 12:27:35 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] there's something happened between kernel 2.6.28-128.1.1 and 2.6.18-128.1.6 compilation
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] there's something happened between kernel 2.6.28-128.1.1 and 2.6.18-128.1.6 compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karanbir Singh wrote: > In the mean time if someone wants to go ahead and work out why that > with_headers got undefined, please go ahead and let us know whats going on. A very brief look at the spec file seems to show that its a bit random, depending on which arch the package is being built for the with_headers can go either way. Why a src.rpm should be affected by required binary output based on arch, is something that needs investigating - however instinct tells me its a bug in the spec itself. Ideally, a src.rpm should be identical generated on any arch with any given set of '--defines'. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] there's something happened between kernel 2.6.28-128.1.1 and 2.6.18-128.1.6 compilation
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] there's something happened between kernel 2.6.28-128.1.1 and 2.6.18-128.1.6 compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list