On Apr 20, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> In the mean time if someone wants to go ahead and work out why that >> with_headers got undefined, please go ahead and let us know whats >> going on. > > A very brief look at the spec file seems to show that its a bit > random, > depending on which arch the package is being built for the > with_headers > can go either way. > > Why a src.rpm should be affected by required binary output based on > arch, is something that needs investigating - however instinct tells > me > its a bug in the spec itself. Ideally, a src.rpm should be identical > generated on any arch with any given set of '--defines'. > SRPM's are produced on a machine with an arch, and so results can/will vary. Your instinct is correct. But the kernel.spec has always been hugely complicated. 73 de Jeff