On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 17:41 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > The spec is included in-line, below. The src rpm is here (I will > eventually be removing it): > > http://www.m3freak.com/freeradius-2.1.3-1.el5.gl.src.rpm > Update: I still haven't figured out how to handle the "group does not exist" error. I'm considering not bothering with trying to fix it since it's not a real problem anyway. Good idea or bad? > %changelog > * Wed Mar 25 2009 Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu <ranbirsandhu at globalive.com> - > 2.1.3-1.1 > - initial CentOS 5 release > > * Thu Dec 4 2008 John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com> - 2.1.3-1 > - upgrade to latest upstream release, upstream summary follows: I'm not sure how to handle the versioning. Should I do what I've done above (add a .1), or leave the version at 2.1.3-1, and just note that it's the intial Centos 5 release based on the Fedora 10 SRPM (see below)? - initial CentOS 5 release (rebuilt from Fedora 10 SRPM) I don't know what the best option is. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 16:47:56 up 15 days, 16:44, 4 users, load average: 1.10, 0.51, 0.23