On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Brandon Davidson wrote: > R P Herrold wrote: > >> and a couple more things jump out at me. By and large, I see >> NO dark art here, requiring that such a review and proposed >> fix cannot be done by anyone, diffing the present upstream >> original and the last shipped patches (once CentOS variant >> SRPMs are retrievable), and ... > > Hey, just because I have time to track it down for a user on the forum and file > a bug doesn't mean I have time to fix it ;) I agree, though, it doesn't look too > difficult to correct the immediate issue. It looks like the original patch is > from hughesjr; I'll keep an eye out for the 5.3 SRPMs and submit a patch if I > have time. > >> frankly, who _cares_ to install packages which ** cannot ** >> work as upstream does not release the server side sources for >> the RHN, such that we cannot replicate it (it not being clear >> that we have a desire as a project to so proceed) > > My point was that we are providing translations for packages that we don't ship, > and contributing to the confusion of users that do install those packages on > their own. It's worth pointing out (again) that we are providing *erroneous* translations. The Red Hat Network *is* the Red Hat Network - there is no CentOS Network, etc. --- Charlie