On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:44 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: > > then you'd have to send to the upstream rpm, but i'd be more happy to > fix #495689 and be able to use 5.3's rpm with mock-0.9 instead of > 5.2's > rpm:-) > Well I (and @rpm5.org) are "upstream rpm", just not yours. Too bad for you. I will generate a patch for any version of rpm when given 1) what version of rpm is in use 2) a reliable report that the procedure I described reproduces the error. 73 de Jeff