On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 12:39 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Phil Schaffner ... > I agree with you. This is a *bug* known to upstream. The CentOS bug > report should not have been closed based on the fact building was > successful by some people or under "certain" circumstances. But I am > not the one who closed it ( have no such privilege anyway :-D ). Yup - didn't intend to imply that you did. Hard to tell in a thread which comments are meant for the replied-to person and which are for general consumption (or in this case Karanbir consumption). > >but closing it because upstream has closed it > > NEXTRELEASE does, so I guess it's a moot point for this particular case. > > Yes, now it (closing the bug) is rationalized (after the fact). ;-P We agree on that also! :-D Cheers, Phil