Nikola Ciprich wrote: > OK, > seems like bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4 got into the 4.8 updates in the meantime, > so the problem is certainly solved. > have a nice day > n. > Yes, all 3 of the RPMS you mentioned, as well as ntp and evolution28-pango had updates released before 4.8 upstream, but did not make onto the 4.8 ISO/Tree ... they have been moved into updates. Thanks for the initial report. > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:33:07PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> Nikola Ciprich wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> it seems there is something wrong with the repositories after 4.8 release. >>> some packages (pango, acpid and most notably bind, probably others too) are >>> in much older versions in base repo then they were in updates before 4.8 >>> >>> Could somebody check it please? >>> >>> with best regards >>> >>> nik >>> >> Pango is pango-1.6.0-9.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO >> >> acpid is acpid-1.0.3-2.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO >> >> bind is bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm is on the RHEL 4.8 ISO >> >> all of those are the same in our base repo and on our ISO. We duplicate >> their release in this, as that is our goal. (The things in the base repo >> are what is on the ISO). >> >> I will double check all updates are pushed into updates if there are >> some that were released by RH before 4.8 was released, but did not make >> it onto their ISO. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090825/3c154a1d/attachment-0007.sig>