[CentOS-devel] Spammer: Did we shut him down?
John Summerfield
debian at herakles.homelinux.orgThu Feb 5 12:47:47 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Spammer: Did we shut him down?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Spammer: Did we shut him down?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > > Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. 1, I get quite a few of those, at another address. It's sent "from" me. 2. There's nothing to prevent anyone from subcsribing to this list and harvesting addresses of all contributors. 3. Before implementing SPF, google for and join some antispam lists. I did so, and the consensus on one of them was that SPF isn't a good answer. CSV was regarded as preferable. Here's the first hit when I asked google "why not spf." http://72.14.235.132/search?q=cache:YNZEP38CoFEJ:david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html+why+not+SPF&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&lr=lang_en I'm using google's cache because the original site's not available atm. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-)
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Spammer: Did we shut him down?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Spammer: Did we shut him down?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list