Milan Keršláger napsal(a): > Please, > > do not delay this "Important" multiple security update. See > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html for more info. > > This update is "5.3" kernel but has been released as security update > too. RHN pushed this kernel one day ahead of rest of 5.3 packages (on my > servers). > > RH maintains API and ABI (!) compatibility so there is no problem to use > this kernel AFAIK. > > So please, do not delay it anymore, this contains multiple security > vulnerabilities fixed since 2009-01-20. > > Thank you for your effort (a lot). > > M.K. > Tru's right. It not only depends on ecryptfs-utils but other new packages. It's right it builds fine, but finally depends on a lot of new modules. Some: %define kernel_dot_org_conflicts ppp < 2.4.3-3, isdn4k-utils < 3.2-32, nfs-utils < 1.0.7-12, e2fsprogs < 1.37-4, util-linux < 2.12, jfsutils < 1.1.7-2, reiserfs-utils < 3.6.19-2, xfsprogs < 2.6.13-4, procps < 3.2.5-6.3, oprofile < 0.9.1-2 %define package_conflicts initscripts < 7.23, udev < 063-6, iptables < 1.3.2-1, ipw2200-firmware < 2.4, selinux-policy-targeted < 1.25.3-14, ecryptfs-utils < 44, cpuspeed < 1.2.1-5 Milan, you can try yourself testing kernel here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ I'd like to point out one thing. I do want to thank to Centos developers they have changed update build process. Even that there is 5.3 rebuild process ongoing, they are releasing security updates for C{3,4,5} and I like it. This is a new behavior, because every time they had been rebuilding new distro version, security updates process got stucked. So, thank you Pasi and Tru. Regards, David