Brandon Davidson a écrit : > Hi Tim, > > I know that we're still kind of in the middle of 5.3 testing, but I thought that > I'd pop this back to the top so that perhaps it can find some time between 5.3 > and whatever comes up next for QA. > > I think the consensus was that the DS builds all work well - everything seems to > be stable, and with the exception of a few minor install-time items that could > be reported to upstream and/or fixed in CentOS packages, it's pretty much ready > to go. CentOS DS is also stable for us in production environment. So It'd be fine to add it in the next CentOS 5.3 release. > I believe there were some legal questions about the Java bits that were > never satisfactorily answered, but that OpenJDK was a possible solution? > This part should be solved, as OpenJDK is now officialy part of RHL 5.3 :-) > There's also the issue of the IPA packages: > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEIPA/SRPMS/ > > Last I heard, you were going to attempt to get these built, but were hoping for > some help with repackaging/branding checks. Did that ever go anywhere? If > someone can give me some direction or something to work on, I'd be glad to put > some time into it. > > Regards, > > -Brandon > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >