Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009, seth vidal a écrit : > On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 19:16 +0100, Alain PORTAL wrote: > > > > OK. If you say it, I trust you ;-) > > I thought an upgrade was needed. > > a long time ago that was potentially true. > > the difference between yum update and yum upgrade was whether or not > obsoletes were processed. In an upgrade they were, in an update they > defaulted to not. This was necessary in a world where mutually > obsoleting pkgs were allowed. Since about rhel4 and beyond no one has > been letting a distro out the door with mutually obsoleting pkgs. So it > was not longer a big deal. > > obsoletes=1 is now the yum default. > > Hope that helps. For understanding, yes. Thanks -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090116/e0fcef81/attachment-0007.sig>