Charlie Brady wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, John Summerfield wrote: > >> Charlie Brady wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Farkas Levente wrote: >>> >>>> one more problem what i found with this new weak-updates kmod packages >>>> that it can't updated ie. the previous version won't be delete with yum. >>>> i don't know the reason but may be since it's provides kernel-modules >>>> and yum don't update kernel* packages just install it. but imho in this >>>> case it'd be better to update it. >>>> any suggestions? >>> Do you really need the previous versions to be deleted? Ophaned kernel >>> modules don't use much space, and are harmless. >> In years past I recall it was important to have the right libc. Can we >> be sure old pg works with new libc? Where are the compatibility libraries? > > We're talking about old kmod packages here. Look at the time I wrote it, I should have been in bed. I hope that's all the nonsense I've disseminated:-( -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-)