On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Seth Vidal<skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >>> I know of at least one issue with yum in CentOS-5. If I try to build >>> grub in mock, I get: >>> >>> No Package Found for /usr/lib/crt1.o >>> 0:binutils-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5.x86_64 >>> 0:ncurses-devel-5.5-24.20060715.x86_64 >>> >>> Cannot find build req /usr/lib/crt1.o. Exiting. > >> centos5 has been out for a looooooooooong time now and the yum that's in >> centos 5.3 has had a number of bugfixes. > > Sorry, the above example output was from a CentOS 5.3 system with > yum-3.2.19-18.el5. It was generated a few hours ago. :) > >> So is yum 3.X considered bad b/c 3.0.X had some bugs? > > No, I did not say that. However, I will continue to use CentOS-4 for > running mock for the time being. > >> B/c lemme tell you 2.4.X had a good number of bugs, too. > > I firmly believe you. :-) > >>> This still happens with the current yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch >>> (and mock-0.6.13-1.el5_2.3.x86_64) in CentOS-5. >> >> It looks like it is fixed in yum available for what will be centos >> 5.4/rhel 5.4. >> >> yum 3.2.22 doesn't have it this issue. > > I'm not sure why, but I just installed yum-3.2.22-15.el5.noarch (from > RHEL5.4beta) and mock ended with the same error as above... > 1. did you clean out the mock cache entirely? 2. I just tested 3.2.22-14 on rhel5 - here's what I get: yum resolvedep /usr/lib/crt1.o Loaded plugins: security Importing additional filelist information 0:glibc-devel-2.5-34.i386 -sv