[CentOS-devel] yum-3.2.8-9 CentOS 4 backport - Call for QA
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.comWed Mar 4 00:04:07 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] yum-3.2.8-9 CentOS 4 backport - Call for QA
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] yum-3.2.8-9 CentOS 4 backport - Call for QA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
on 3-3-2009 3:41 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following: > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> Please keep in mind that yum-3.0.x and 3.2.8 have had quite a few >> issues, and in our testing within CentOS we found yum 2.4.x to be the >> best release to use on CentOS-4. > > Having said that while the main distro yum wont move from 2.4.x - these > might make for a good centosplus addition in c4. I'm guessing most of > your porting work was to adapt to the older python and the slightly > different rpm on c4, How much of that could be pushed back upstream ? > Will upstream even accept anything like this on EL4 anymore? Isn't it too late in the cycle for feature additions? -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090303/80ef29f3/attachment-0002.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] yum-3.2.8-9 CentOS 4 backport - Call for QA
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] yum-3.2.8-9 CentOS 4 backport - Call for QA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list