[CentOS-devel] yum-3.2.8-9 CentOS 4 backport - Call for QA

Wed Mar 4 00:04:07 UTC 2009
Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com>

on 3-3-2009 3:41 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Please keep in mind that yum-3.0.x and 3.2.8 have had quite a few 
>> issues, and in our testing within CentOS we found yum 2.4.x to be the 
>> best release to use on CentOS-4.
> Having said that while the main distro yum wont move from 2.4.x - these 
> might make for a good centosplus addition in c4. I'm guessing most of 
> your porting work was to adapt to the older python and the slightly 
> different rpm on c4, How much of that could be pushed back upstream ?
Will upstream even accept anything like this on EL4 anymore? Isn't it too late
in the cycle for feature additions?

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090303/80ef29f3/attachment-0005.sig>