[CentOS-devel] yum-3.2.8-9 CentOS 4 backport - Call for QA

Wed Mar 4 00:04:07 UTC 2009
Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com>

on 3-3-2009 3:41 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Please keep in mind that yum-3.0.x and 3.2.8 have had quite a few 
>> issues, and in our testing within CentOS we found yum 2.4.x to be the 
>> best release to use on CentOS-4.
> 
> Having said that while the main distro yum wont move from 2.4.x - these 
> might make for a good centosplus addition in c4. I'm guessing most of 
> your porting work was to adapt to the older python and the slightly 
> different rpm on c4, How much of that could be pushed back upstream ?
> 
Will upstream even accept anything like this on EL4 anymore? Isn't it too late
in the cycle for feature additions?


-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090303/80ef29f3/attachment-0007.sig>