The question is this. exists, the body of registered trademarks and patents, a company with the name openoffice. has only one image. nothing more. This is why the open sun, in Brazil, was broffice 2009/3/25 Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange at nsk.no-ip.org>: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:51:04PM +0200, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:04:14AM -0300, Thiago Avelino wrote: >> > >> >> Please read: >> >> >> >> Because OpenOffice.org is called BrOffice.org in Brazil? >> >> >> > >> > Do you even know what patents are?? >> > >> > Here's what you wrote: >> > "here in Brazil we can not be using OpenOffice.org >> > because of trademarks and patents" >> > >> > I want you to mention those patents that prevent OpenOffice.org from >> > being used in Brazil but not BrOffice (or retract that part of the >> > statement). >> > >> > Again: Patentes não são marcas registadas, é uma ferramenta legal >> > completamente diferente com outras implicações. Se OpenOffice viola >> > patentes no Brasil, como o BrOffice é um produto derivado também as >> > violará. >> > >> > >> It's not a matter of patents but of the name. "OpenOffice " is >> registered over there . >> > > Ah, but that's not what the first email said. I'm not opposed to > including BrOffice in CentOS. I've mentioned, in my first reply, the > current solution in use by Fedora. > > I've no say either way, I'm just an interested observer. :P > > Regards, > Luciano Rocha > > -- > lfr > 0/0 > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -- att. Thiago Avelino Programador | SysAdmin Linux User: #484673 Asterisk User: #63483 Digium User: D1039273 São Paulo - SP / Brasil www.avelino.us | www.centos-br.org Linkedin | linkedin.com/in/thiagoavelinoster Twitter | twitter.com/thiagoavelinost JustinTV | justin.tv/thiagoavelino