-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tru Huynh escreveu: > Thanks for the info. Welcome. =) > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:58:20PM +0100, Claudio F Filho wrote: > Does that also mean that all the commercial linux distributions > sold in Brazil have a custom made OpenOffice.org ? No. Ubuntu already have the Broo pkg. RH and Novell not yet. I already told with the brazilian manager of this companies about this question but without solution. The people of Fedora have (or is in study). I haven't exact numbers about the "linux population" here, but our numbers are 50M of desktops, where 15M have Broo, and in this machines, 85% is windows. About linux specifically, i can talk about projects like "Linux Educacional"[1], where we talk about "a very clean Debian-based distribution" to a reality of "29,000 labs deployed, serving approximately 36 million students". [1]http://piacentini.livejournal.com/7871.html RH, Mandriva and Novell basically attempt servers, and some desktops. The bigs projects that i know uses fedora, ubuntu and debian, and where use fedora, like in Serpro[2], our federal processing data service, with 250k desktops running a customized fedora in 2007, aways was with Broo pkg(rpm.tar.gz) proved by us (without optimization like in debian, generic for all rpm linux based). [2]http://www.serpro.gov.br/ > imho, that should be pushed upstream... Sorry... i not understood. 'upstream' of OOo or CentOS? If is about OOo, Broo (with images and patches) *is part* of the source of OOo. If is about CentOS, +1. =) Bests Claudio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknLd/AACgkQ0U74969cpYm0XwCggzzWe8WVNFefh6q/SyQpnUFl AtsAoKdY/raoR+KLSZFbHcogQ0zI4aq3 =BEBh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----