On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 16:54 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Update: > > I still haven't figured out how to handle the "group does not exist" > error. I'm considering not bothering with trying to fix it since it's > not a real problem anyway. Good idea or bad? > > > %changelog > > * Wed Mar 25 2009 Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu <ranbirsandhu at globalive.com> - > > 2.1.3-1.1 > > - initial CentOS 5 release > > > > * Thu Dec 4 2008 John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com> - 2.1.3-1 > > - upgrade to latest upstream release, upstream summary follows: > > I'm not sure how to handle the versioning. Should I do what I've done > above (add a .1), or leave the version at 2.1.3-1, and just note that > it's the intial Centos 5 release based on the Fedora 10 SRPM (see > below)? > > - initial CentOS 5 release (rebuilt from Fedora 10 SRPM) > > I don't know what the best option is. Any comments on my previous reply (above)? I'd really appreciate some advice - I want to get my package into centosplus. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 21:25:34 up 16 days, 21:21, 2 users, load average: 1.25, 0.67, 0.41