On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 16:47 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > <snip> > sent out ? I know changelog has been something that people have > mentioned in the past, is that still something that might be > good-to-have / must-have in the announcement emails ? If it imposes more non-automated work on the CentOS team, I'm comfy with the simple inclusion of the upstream URL, as you currently do it. > > Also, for CentOS-4, only security updates are normally announced. What > do people feel about changing that so that all updates are announced, > including SA / BA / EA and CentOS specific bugfix's ? +1 > > Finally, and this is the big question that *will* impact a lot of people > and specially those with automation - what do people think about > combined update announcements for all Arch's in a single email like what > happens upstream ? C2.1/C3/C4 will be hard to get into this process > since the arch specific builders dont stay in sync, but for C5, with the > ia64/ppc and s390 now pretty much online with the i386 and x86_64 its > something that we *could* potentially target. Whatever minimizes the team workload is good by me. I *do* find convenient the separation done now. So if the manual effort is a wash between the two, I like the way it is. -- Bill