On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 19:30 +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: > ok let make things more specific: > > deltarpm in epel 3.4-8.el5.1 while in fedora 3.5-0.4.20090913git is > there any significant/relevant changes? when do you plan 3.5 release? I'm currently building it and will push it to testing ASAP. The main difference is that it supports xz-compressed RPMS (which shouldn't matter for CentOS) and it has a python API (which will be useful). > i'd be useful to add yum-presto to epel too. at the same time which > version required by yum-presto? in rhel/centos-5 yum-3.2.22 included, > but i read somewhere (and i can't find now where) that at least > yum-3.2.23 required. so what's the correct version? I think presto should work with any modern version of yum, including 3.2.22. In fact, I have at various times used it on my CentOS 5 boxes. I'll see about branching it for EPEL. > also a presto-utils would be useful in epel. rebuilding from fedora > presto-utils-0.3.4-3 gives this error: <snip> > it's be useful to be at least a minimal manual how we can use these > tools and and who we can generate deltarpms. Fedora is using createrepo, not presto-utils to generate their deltarpms. Presto-utils should be deprecated (or at least, mainly used for pruning out old drpms, etc). Jonathan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20091115/57752f09/attachment-0007.sig>