On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:21 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tait Clarridge <tait at clarridge.ca> wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:26 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > > > To be honest, I am not quite sure "exactly" what it entails, but I think > > it is related to: > > > > http://xenbits.xen.org/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg?rev/cdadea74443c > > > > I can double check with the xen list and post back if you would like. > > Porting those patches to the CentOS kernel may not be straightforward. > The first file does not exist in CentOS. The second file exists but > looks a bit different. So, if someone can offer a version applicable > to the CentOS kernel, that would be great. > > Akemi I will talk to the developer who wrote those patches and see what he/we can do to make it more CentOS friendly. Thanks for the input, I will get back to the list if anything comes from this. Best, Tait -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20091116/34ad7998/attachment-0007.sig>