Hi Jerry, On 11/24/2009 09:36 PM, Jerry Amundson wrote: >> were not interested in what software is going to be used - lets focus on >> what needs to be done, built around some user stories and then see what >> software meets the requirements. > > Yes, I agree to those points and didn't "miss" them. The scope > described above makes sense. One thing that came up on the phone conf the other day was that we might be going about this whole process the wrong way and what we might want to do - need not really reflect what makes life easier for the users and gets a good knowledge base built around existing resources. The other thing is that while forums were a big part of the language-subsites-issue, none of the people on the conf were really forum users. Which is why it was decided to come up with a set of questions we cna put out there for everyone to answer, and then have a recap meeting in a few weeks time. -- Karanbir Singh London, UK | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc