[CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus: Valuable or wasted resource?
Ross Walker
rswwalker at gmail.comThu Sep 10 14:24:32 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] How to rebuild kernel-2.6.18-164.el5.src.rpm from RHEL 5.4?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus: Valuable or wasted resource?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Is CentOS Plus really necessary? The reason I ask is it seems it is there to provide additional kernel modules not included in the base repo that could be added to 'extras' as kmods. Now I know there are some who would like to boot off of fireware drives and such, but is it worth the development effort having a separate kernel tree that, frankly is always behind, needs extra resources to maintain and offers little over standalone kernel modules? The resources and time that go into maintaining CentOS Plus could go into improving and maintaining the few add-on kernel modules and keeping up with security and bug updates. Let outside repos provide custom kernels. Well that is my .02. -Ross
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] How to rebuild kernel-2.6.18-164.el5.src.rpm from RHEL 5.4?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus: Valuable or wasted resource?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list