[CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus: Valuable or wasted resource?
Ross Walker
rswwalker at gmail.comFri Sep 11 17:39:33 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus: Valuable or wasted resource?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus: Valuable or wasted resource?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 09/11/2009 02:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote: >> Ok, so is ELrepo the "officially supported" third party repo for >> CentOS, like epel is for RHEL? > > the closest thing to an official extras repo outside .centos.org is > rpmrepo.org - aside from that is the extras repo actually hosted at > centos.org. > > I've just read this entire thread and I totally fail to see what your > point is. The CentOSPlus repo makes it possible to do somethings in a > more distro friendly way and allows people to opt in should they so > desire, if thats something you dont want to do - feel free to stay ( as > is default ) opted out. The original point of the thread was to bring to question whether the cplus kernel was eating valuable developer time and from the informative responses I got from Tim, Akemi and Johnny I was assured it wasn't and that it is used to provide access to valuable kernel patches that are slow to be incorporated upstream. It was not a critique, but an explorative narrative, the outcome of which was: valuable resource. -Ross
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus: Valuable or wasted resource?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus: Valuable or wasted resource?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list