On 09/11/2009 10:56 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote: > On 11/09/2009, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > >> >> One (minor) drawback of keeping both kmods is that each time >> >> /sbin/meak-module is run, it has to do extra work going through all >> >> installed kernels, once for kmod-drbd82 and another time for >> >> kmod-drbd83. >> >> >> >> Akemi >> >> - now completely hiding under a huge rock >> > >> > A question in two parts -- for Akemi to consider: >> > >> > Are the kmod-drbd* packages kABI tracking? Or are they kernel version dependant? >> > >> > Alan. >> >> >> The recent version of kmod-drbd82 is kABI-tracking. kmod-drbd83 is >> new and is also kABI-tracking. > > Hmm. I see. Thanks. > > Alan. > (Who now wonders if there is space for him to hide behind Akemi's rock . . . ) They are kABI tracking, however that still requires certain versions of things. The new module will not install on a 5.2 kernel, for example ... but the 82 module will install on there. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20090911/e2c2b9a7/attachment-0005.sig>