On 22/09/09 19:51, Ross Walker wrote: >>> Well maybe a dkms port to 'extras' wouldn't be asking too much? >> >> It's in EPEL, if we can leverage off that... > > It really is important to have the dkms kmod and dkms located in the > same repo for dependancy reasons. inspite of it being interesting, you *do* still have the wrong list for this conversation.