On 08/18/2010 09:39 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> Oh, but ... on my Fedora 13 box, I have: >>> >>> rpm -qa | grep nx >>> nxclient-3.4.0-7.x86_64 >>> freenx-client-0.9-10.fc11.x86_64 >>> freenx-server-0.7.3-18.fc13.x86_64 >>> nxcl-0.9-10.fc11.x86_64 >>> nx-3.3.0-38.fc12.x86_64 >>> qtnx-0.9-10.fc11.x86_64 >>> >>> >> But yet, despite my previous errior, the packages are not branched for >> EPEL, so my previous evaluation ( no conflicts ) still stands. >> > > Yes, that agrees with my previous post regarding "no NX in EPEL". > > Actually the stuff in fedora is similar to the ATrpms packages -- nx > is obsolete. If you happen to know the co-maintainer, could you ask > him/her to update it? > No, I do not know him except for occasional bug reviews. But a RFE via bugzilla.r.c can be filed by anyone :) > So, currently, what CentOS provides is most up-to-date. :-D > > >> Manuel "I'll be more attentive after I grab some sleep. I promise" >> > > I thought you never sleep, Manuel. :-P > Heh... I have to, once in a while.