On 9 August 2010 07:38, Jake Shipton <jakems at hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > Yup, down here also when trying to access from a browser due to a > time-out :-(. > > Although apparently it's not totally down as I can ping it: > > PING centos.org (72.232.194.162) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com > (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=148 ms > 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com > (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=151 ms > 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com > (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=155 ms > 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com > (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=4 ttl=42 time=149 ms > ^C > - --- centos.org ping statistics --- > 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3444ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 148.856/151.244/155.702/2.692 ms Confirmed. Satisfactory pings from the U.K. [ajb at Duo1 ~]$ ping -c5 centos.org PING centos.org (72.232.194.162) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=172 ms 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=194 ms 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 time=217 ms 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 time=127 ms 64 bytes from 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=5 ttl=44 time=127 ms --- centos.org ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 127.858/168.014/217.068/35.671 ms [ajb at Duo1 ~]$ Alan.