On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: > On 08/18/2010 09:23 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Manuel Wolfshant >> <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: >> Oh, but ... on my Fedora 13 box, I have: >> >> rpm -qa | grep nx >> nxclient-3.4.0-7.x86_64 >> freenx-client-0.9-10.fc11.x86_64 >> freenx-server-0.7.3-18.fc13.x86_64 >> nxcl-0.9-10.fc11.x86_64 >> nx-3.3.0-38.fc12.x86_64 >> qtnx-0.9-10.fc11.x86_64 >> > But yet, despite my previous errior, the packages are not branched for > EPEL, so my previous evaluation ( no conflicts ) still stands. Yes, that agrees with my previous post regarding "no NX in EPEL". Actually the stuff in fedora is similar to the ATrpms packages -- nx is obsolete. If you happen to know the co-maintainer, could you ask him/her to update it? So, currently, what CentOS provides is most up-to-date. :-D > Manuel "I'll be more attentive after I grab some sleep. I promise" I thought you never sleep, Manuel. :-P Akemi