[CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
Charlie Brady
charlieb-centos-devel at budge.apana.org.auTue Dec 14 03:03:08 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS and rhn tools
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Martin Jungowski wrote: > It's not. It's just a general wondering as to why one would refer to > something as i386 when in reality it's i686 instead. You should ask Red Hat. You're wasting your time (and ours) asking here.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS and rhn tools
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list