[CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
Alan Bartlett
ajb at elrepo.orgWed Dec 15 16:54:14 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
All, As interesting (or not) as this discussion may be, please note that this is the CentOS-devel mailing list and, thus, is not the appropriate venue -- as it has no relevance to the ongoing development of CentOS. Putting that into perspective, the core components of the CentOS Project are those products that are aimed to be 100% binary compatible with the Upstream Vendor's products. Therefore if i386 is used upstream as a label, it will also be used likewise by the CentOS Project. Please take the discussion of processors, instruction sets, et al, to the CentOS general m/l. In peace and friendship, Alan. :-)
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why does CentOS 5 claim to be i386 compatible when it's really not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list