2010/12/27 Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>: > On 12/27/2010 09:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 12/27/10 1:10 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote: >> >>> 2010/12/26 Michał Piotrowski<mkkp4x4 at gmail.com>: >>> >>>> So I wonder what are the chances of seeing CentOS6 in 2011. Or perhaps >>>> a more realistic date is 2012? >>>> (Maybe you are waiting for the release of DNF?) >>>> >>> The problem with this kind of question is the closed development process of CentOS. >>> >>> Even Microsoft's development process (public beta, rc, roadmap, release date) is more open than in CentOS. >>> >>> A good example of a transparent development process is Scientific Linux. >>> >>> >> >> The price is right - use both if you want. The SL alphas are out now and >> should be close enough for testing purposes. >> > Actually I switched my RHEL6b2 to current SL and it works perfectly so far. Did you go down the package list and do "yum re-install" of all the packages which have identical names in both? It's potentially helpful to avoid confusion about subtly different "foo-release-version.arch.rpm" packages from each repository, which can happen when both repositories publish new releases as increments of a single digit from the previous release.