Le 30/11/10 09:32, Manuel Wolfshant a écrit : > On 11/30/2010 12:48 AM, Ned Slider wrote: >> On 29/11/10 21:08, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> ... >> My use of the quoted term "minimal" was perhaps misleading - I meant it >> to refer to the fact that Disk1 could be used as a stand alone disk and >> would not require the "optional" Disk2. > Argh.. Indeed, it was misleading. In this case I agree with you , having > a fully contained first DVD ( even smaller than the maximum size allowed > by the standard !) labeled and able to be used as "server DVD" would fit > my needs. +1 JML