W dniu 26 grudnia 2010 20:38 użytkownik R P Herrold <herrold at centos.org> napisał: > On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > >> So I wonder what are the chances of seeing CentOS6 in 2011. >> Or perhaps a more realistic date is 2012? (Maybe you are >> waiting for the release of DNF?) > > The choice always comes down to ship less well vetted content > fast; or a full set of which one may be proud, less quickly > > My last post here noted that Red Hat ran a four month beta > program, AFTER their internal stabilization. Yeah, but I don't expect from CentOS any stabilization - only rebuild of packages. > My blog post > crossing 'planet.centos.org' made it clear Sorry, but I did not even realize that such thing as planet.c.o exist. Also I did not realize that you and your blog exist. The only thing that I see is that after a month and half only one package has changed graphics/strings etc. Because I do not see any progress on http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/6/AuditStatus I'm wondering if CentOS team wants to release this OS this year, next year or anytime in the near future. > that the CentOS > team simply are not much driven to respond to 'popular demand' > or press pressure, and more motivated to produce a durable > product. Before that my post here noted that it was unlikely > that few oterh than hard core developers who enjoyed pain > would ever be able to do a yum transition from 5 to 6, as 6 is > rather radically different 'under the hood' as to SELinux > model > > When people are inclined to carp about release pace, they > might find it more profitable to look through the open wiki > page on the release, or the open bugtrackker bugs, and > document a solution for an unresolved issue, if they wanted to > get a release sooner > > ... just a wild idea > > -- Russ herrold > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Best regards, Michal Sent from my fscking awesome Black Hole Generator