On 12/27/2010 09:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/27/10 1:10 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote: > >> 2010/12/26 Michał Piotrowski<mkkp4x4 at gmail.com>: >> >>> So I wonder what are the chances of seeing CentOS6 in 2011. Or perhaps >>> a more realistic date is 2012? >>> (Maybe you are waiting for the release of DNF?) >>> >> The problem with this kind of question is the closed development process of CentOS. >> >> Even Microsoft's development process (public beta, rc, roadmap, release date) is more open than in CentOS. >> >> A good example of a transparent development process is Scientific Linux. >> >> > > The price is right - use both if you want. The SL alphas are out now and > should be close enough for testing purposes. > Actually I switched my RHEL6b2 to current SL and it works perfectly so far.