[CentOS-devel] Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS?
Miroslav Suchý
msuchy at redhat.com
Fri Jan 22 11:06:28 UTC 2010
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Spacewalk development is much faster which may lead into missing
> features as they are not yet implemented in the version that is meant
> to be used with rhn.
If you have environment when you want to centraly manage your machines
and installing from is only way, you want to have yum-rhn-plugin
available just after kickstart. Just to be able to install package. You
do not care about recent features.
But I have to admit, that I do not know how many such users and
environment exists.
> The only option I see is to keep the rhns and spacewalk-client
> packages in sync, which may be the case in the near future (e.g. on
> RHEL 6)
Yes, keep status que and do not remove it from CentOS 6 is definitely
valid option.
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Satellite Engineering
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list