Marcus Moeller wrote: > An option would be to include all packages from the newly created > Spacewalk $ver-client repo, e.g.: > > http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum/0.7-client/RHEL/5/i386/ Not in CentOS5 since recent this version require python-dmidecode which is not in RHEL and therefore probably in CentOS. > For Fedora, the plan is to bring these packages to the main tree, and > most of them are already there. Yes, I'm preparing them. Ale mentioned packages are already there. Bunch of others are on the way. > As Miroslav already stated that these packages won't hit > rhn.redhat.com I do not thing that should be a big problem. Partialy true. Recent upstream version will not hit accidentaly rhn.redhat.com That version included in RHEL will do that by default. But these change: https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/changeset/cd925d940357d145c7106c1c3ed6ed12dff29e9d/client is only one which are required to prevent from accidental check of rhn.redhat.com So my recomendation is: take this patch and apply it on current rhel5 package and include all of them in CentOS. > Setting up an own repo for the 'server' part of Spacewalk within the > CentOS Space does not make much sense imho and would cause overhead. +1 -- Miroslav Suchy Red Hat Satellite Engineering