On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, R P Herrold wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Charlie Brady wrote: > > >> Tru has done the builds this morning, ... > > > > There seems to be a systematic process issue that the CentOS project > > should address. There shouldn't be a single point of failure. I would > > think that more tech resources are available to you if you ask. > > The lead CentOS devels have a redesign for some more > 'trellising' in front of them presently. > > There is a entire workflow and QA to this which needs to be > done right, or we might, (for example) introduce possible > mirror skews and potentially unsolveable dependency holes > requiring manual problem solving on literally millions of > machines. We dare not risk such slipping into our process But unpatched security holes is OK? ;-) I do respect what you are saying, but I don't see evidence that final QA and pushing to mirrors is what is holding up these updates.