On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 13:48 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 07/23/2010 06:21 AM, JohnS wrote: > >>> temp fs scares me unless I have a machine capable of RAM RAID 1 + Multi > >>> ECC and I have only one atm. It would be a much better way, I can't > >>> argue that point. > > Its only the buildroots that are hosted in tmpfs, not the scripts or the > process around it. The buildroots are rebuild from scratch on each > package build, so if the machine reboots you only lose the > currently-being-built-package, nothing else around it. > > - KB --- Thank you Karan John